<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<PRONOM-Report xmlns="http://pronom.nationalarchives.gov.uk">
  <report_format_detail>
    <FileFormat>
      <FormatID>2873</FormatID>
      <FormatName>IMF Package Composition Playlist</FormatName>
      <FormatVersion> </FormatVersion>
      <FormatAliases> </FormatAliases>
      <FormatFamilies> </FormatFamilies>
      <FormatTypes>Text (Mark-up)</FormatTypes>
      <FormatDisclosure> </FormatDisclosure>
      <FormatDescription>The Interoperable Master Format (IMF) is a file-based media format, and an IMF Package is a collection of media files with accompanying XML data describing the IMF Package structure. The Composition Playlist (CPL) in an XML file that describes how media components are assembled on a timeline for specific content representations. A CPL file should be found alongside other IMP component files.</FormatDescription>
      <BinaryFileFormat> </BinaryFileFormat>
      <ByteOrders> </ByteOrders>
      <ReleaseDate> </ReleaseDate>
      <WithdrawnDate> </WithdrawnDate>
      <ProvenanceSourceID>244</ProvenanceSourceID>
      <ProvenanceName>Preservica / Preservica</ProvenanceName>
      <ProvenanceSourceDate>19 Apr 2024</ProvenanceSourceDate>
      <ProvenanceDescription> </ProvenanceDescription>
      <LastUpdatedDate>19 Apr 2024</LastUpdatedDate>
      <FileFormatIdentifier>
        <Identifier>fmt/1999</Identifier>
        <IdentifierType>PUID</IdentifierType>
      </FileFormatIdentifier>
      <ExternalSignature>
        <ExternalSignatureID> </ExternalSignatureID>
        <Signature>xml</Signature>
        <SignatureType>File extension</SignatureType>
      </ExternalSignature>
      <InternalSignature>
        <SignatureID>2354</SignatureID>
        <SignatureName>IMF Package Composition Playlist</SignatureName>
        <SignatureNote>XML declaration, followed by &lt;CompositionPlaylist opening tag, shortly followed by a reference to http://www.smpte-ra.org, included here to avoid any incidental clashes with non-IMF formats using similar tags. Note that this signature doesn’t currently utilize any specific XML Namespace element for CPL, although this could be included if there is a requirement to distinguish between different schema compliance.</SignatureNote>
        <ByteSequence>
          <ByteSequenceID>1</ByteSequenceID>
          <PositionType>Absolute from BOF</PositionType>
          <Offset>0</Offset>
          <MaxOffset>0</MaxOffset>
          <IndirectOffsetLocation> </IndirectOffsetLocation>
          <IndirectOffsetLength> </IndirectOffsetLength>
          <Endianness> </Endianness>
          <ByteSequenceValue>3C3F786D6C2076657273696F6E3D(22|27)312E30(22|27){1-1024}3C436F6D706F736974696F6E506C61796C697374{5-1024}687474703A2F2F7777772E736D7074652D72612E6F7267</ByteSequenceValue>
        </ByteSequence>
      </InternalSignature>
      <RelatedFormat>
        <RelationshipType>Has priority over</RelationshipType>
        <RelatedFormatID>638</RelatedFormatID>
        <RelatedFormatName>Extensible Markup Language</RelatedFormatName>
        <RelatedFormatVersion> </RelatedFormatVersion>
      </RelatedFormat>
    </FileFormat>
  </report_format_detail>
</PRONOM-Report>